posts

Star Trek Ranked Television Shows

1) Strange New Worlds

People love Star Trek: Strange New Worlds because it combines the classic spirit of the original Star Trek with modern storytelling, production values, and character development. Here’s a breakdown of what makes it so popular:

Return to Episodic Storytelling

Unlike many modern series with long serialized arcs, Strange New Worlds embraces a mostly episodic format, where each episode tells a self-contained story. Fans of classic TOS and TNG appreciate this structure, which allows exploration of different sci-fi concepts, tones, and genres in each episode.

Captain Pike’s Leadership

Anson Mount’s portrayal of Captain Christopher Pike is a huge draw. Pike is a compassionate, optimistic, and morally grounded leader—a throwback to Gene Roddenberry’s original vision of what Starfleet captains should be. He brings charisma and humanity that resonates with longtime fans and newcomers. Plus he has great hair. Kind of the opposite of Picard who looks great bald.

Strong Ensemble Cast

Characters like Spock (Ethan Peck), Number One (Rebecca Romijn), and La’an Noonien-Singh (Christina Chong) bring depth and personality. The show invests in character arcs, balancing action and sci-fi with emotional beats and personal stories.

Stunning Visuals and Design

The production quality is top-notch. The USS Enterprise has been reimagined with respect to the original design but updated with sleek, cinematic visuals. It feels both nostalgic and fresh. The FX is as good as it gets.

Respect for Star Trek Lore

The series honors Star Trek canon while adding new layers, especially with its exploration of legacy characters like Spock and Uhura. It’s nostalgic without being stuck in the past.

Tonal Variety

Episodes range from thrilling space adventures to light-hearted comedic romps and deep philosophical explorations. This tonal flexibility keeps the series engaging and unpredictable.

Inclusivity and Optimism

Strange New Worlds embraces diversity in casting and storytelling, continuing the franchise’s tradition of social commentary. It’s hopeful and aspirational, which is a refreshing counterbalance to many darker sci-fi shows today.

2) The Next Generation

Why Star Trek: The Next Generation Remains So Popular

Star Trek: The Next Generation (TNG), which premiered in 1987, did something many thought impossible—it stepped out from under the long shadow of the original Star Trek series and created a legacy entirely its own. Over three decades later, its popularity endures because it offered a thoughtful, hopeful vision of the future while developing deep, complex characters and exploring timeless social and philosophical questions.

At the core of TNG’s appeal is its captain: Jean-Luc Picard, played by Sir Patrick Stewart. Picard is not just a leader; he is a philosopher, diplomat, and moral compass. His intelligence, restraint, and ethical clarity set the tone for the series. Fans responded to a leader who didn’t win battles with fists or phasers, but with logic, compassion, and eloquence. Picard embodied the best of what humanity could become, and his presence grounded the show in integrity.

TNG also benefitted from a rich and diverse ensemble cast. Characters like Data, the android striving to be human, and Worf, the Klingon struggling between two worlds, provided emotionally resonant storylines. Even minor characters like Chief O’Brien and Guinan (played memorably by Whoopi Goldberg) became fan favorites because of how thoughtfully the show used them. The dynamic among the crew felt genuine, with real chemistry and mutual respect that reflected Roddenberry’s vision of a post-conflict humanity.

Another reason for the show’s enduring popularity is its episodic structure paired with long-form character development. Each episode often posed a moral, ethical, or philosophical dilemma, exploring issues like artificial intelligence, the nature of consciousness, genocide, PTSD, and civil rights. TNG challenged its audience to think critically while never abandoning a sense of wonder. Episodes like “The Measure of a Man,” “The Inner Light,” and “Darmok” are not just sci-fi classics—they are profound meditations on what it means to be alive, to communicate, to evolve.

TNG also benefitted from an era of growing special effects and production quality. While early seasons had uneven writing and budget constraints, the show matured by Season 3 into a polished, sophisticated production. The USS Enterprise-D, with its clean lines and utopian design, became iconic in its own right. The series presented space not as a battlefield, but as a realm of diplomacy, discovery, and possibility.

Importantly, The Next Generation arrived at a cultural moment when audiences were ready for a smarter, more cerebral kind of science fiction. The Cold War was winding down, and TNG’s optimistic view of the future—where humanity had solved poverty, war, and inequality—offered a compelling alternative to the darker dystopias that defined much of 1980s sci-fi. It gave people hope and a sense of direction.

Ultimately, Star Trek: The Next Generation is more than just great television. It is a beacon of thoughtful storytelling, moral inquiry, and imaginative futurism. Its enduring popularity lies in its refusal to talk down to its audience. Instead, it invited viewers to dream, to question, and to believe in a better future.

3) Star Trek (Original)

Why Star Trek: The Original Series Was Ahead of Its Time – And Why It’s Still Relevant 500 Years Later

When Star Trek: The Original Series premiered in 1966, it didn’t just introduce a new science fiction show—it launched a cultural revolution. Created by Gene Roddenberry, the series imagined a future where humanity had overcome poverty, racism, and war. Set aboard the USS Enterprise, it followed Captain James T. Kirk, Mr. Spock, Dr. McCoy, and a diverse crew as they explored strange new worlds and boldly went where no one had gone before.

More than half a century later, the original Star Trek remains one of the most iconic and enduring television shows in history. Its influence spans not only television and cinema, but also technology, politics, ethics, and popular culture. What made Star Trek: The Original Series so special? And how has it managed to remain relevant in every generation?

A Visionary Future That Still Inspires

Unlike many dystopian sci-fi stories of its time, Star Trek painted a hopeful future. It envisioned a united Earth with no hunger, no prejudice, and no war—a bold and optimistic perspective during the turbulent 1960s. At the height of the Cold War and Civil Rights Movement, Roddenberry imagined a world where people of all backgrounds worked together for the common good. It was idealistic, yes—but that’s exactly what made it revolutionary.

Groundbreaking Diversity and Representation

In a time when American television was still dominated by white male leads, Star Trek featured a multicultural crew with strong, capable characters from across the globe (and even beyond). Lieutenant Uhura, played by Nichelle Nichols, was one of the first Black women in a major TV role. Mr. Sulu, played by George Takei, represented Asian Americans in a positive, non-stereotypical role. Ensign Chekov, a Russian character, was onboard during a time when the U.S. and Soviet Union were bitter enemies.

Martin Luther King Jr. famously encouraged Nichols to stay on the show because of its importance to representation. Star Trek didn’t just talk about equality—it showed it.

Social Commentary Through Science Fiction

Star Trek used its futuristic setting to comment on real-world issues like war, racism, gender inequality, and authoritarianism. Episodes like “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield” and “A Taste of Armageddon” used alien cultures and speculative scenarios to reflect human conflicts and moral dilemmas. This approach made the show more than entertainment—it was a weekly parable for social awareness.

Inventive Technology That Predicted the Future

Many of Star Trek’s imaginative gadgets have since become real. Communicators inspired the mobile phone. The ship’s computer anticipated voice assistants like Alexa and Siri. Tablets, video calls, automatic doors, and even 3D printing (replicators) all appeared on the show long before becoming everyday technology.

The show didn’t just imagine the future—it helped shape it.

Enduring Legacy and Fan Culture

Though it was canceled after just three seasons, Star Trek gained a passionate fanbase through reruns and conventions. That fandom led to animated series, motion pictures, spinoffs like The Next Generation and Strange New Worlds, and billions in merchandising. No other science fiction show has created a universe with such depth and longevity.

In fact, Star Trek may be the only franchise that has remained continuously active for nearly 60 years—and could still be celebrated 500 years from now.


Final Thoughts: Why Star Trek Lives On

Star Trek: The Original Series wasn’t just ahead of its time—it transcended time. With its commitment to diversity, innovation, and optimism, it lit a path toward a better future. Its legacy endures not just in television history, but in the values and vision it left behind.

In a world still striving to “live long and prosper,” Star Trek remains more than science fiction. It’s a blueprint for hope.

4) Star Trek Discovery

Why Star Trek: Discovery Has Become a Fan Favorite

When Star Trek: Discovery launched in 2017, it boldly went where no Star Trek series had gone before—both in style and substance. As the first Star Trek show in over a decade, Discovery had the tough task of reintroducing a beloved franchise to a new generation while satisfying longtime fans. Though it sparked debate among traditionalists, Discovery has grown into a fan favorite by pushing boundaries, embracing diversity, and delivering emotionally resonant storytelling with cinematic flair.

A Bold New Format

Discovery broke with Star Trek tradition by adopting a serialized storytelling format, which allowed for deeper character arcs, long-form plot development, and season-long mysteries. This modern structure helped Discovery stand apart from its episodic predecessors, making it more binge-worthy and emotionally complex. Each season introduced a new overarching storyline—from the Klingon War to the mystery of the Red Angel, the threat of the Burn, and the rebuilding of the Federation in the distant future. These arcs brought fresh momentum to the franchise and kept fans eagerly awaiting each new episode.

A Diverse and Inclusive Crew

True to Star Trek’s core philosophy of unity and inclusion, Discovery features one of the most diverse casts in sci-fi history. Sonequa Martin-Green’s Michael Burnham is the first Black woman to lead a Star Trek series, and her journey from mutineer to Starfleet captain offers a deeply layered protagonist unlike any before her. The show also made history by including a same-sex couple, a trans character, and a nonbinary character—giving meaningful representation to audiences who had long been excluded from science fiction narratives.

Stunning Visuals and High Production Value

With its big-budget visuals, Discovery elevated the look of Star Trek to match the standards of modern prestige television. From intricate starship designs to breathtaking alien worlds and immersive space battles, the series delivers a cinematic experience on the small screen. The USS Discovery herself—with her rotating spore drive and sleek, futuristic design—became an instant icon, symbolizing the show’s willingness to embrace bold new technology and storytelling concepts.

Character-Driven Storytelling

What has truly endeared Discovery to fans is its emotional depth. Characters like Saru, Tilly, Stamets, and Book have developed rich backstories, facing internal and external challenges that mirror universal human experiences. Michael Burnham’s evolution—from a logic-driven officer raised by Vulcans to a passionate leader guided by empathy—has been a powerful, character-driven arc that resonates with viewers.

The show also explores the personal cost of leadership, loyalty, and sacrifice. Whether it’s Burnham’s guilt over starting a war, Saru confronting his past, or Stamets grieving lost love, Discovery invests in emotional realism, grounding its high-concept sci-fi in relatable humanity.

A Franchise Willing to Evolve

Star Trek: Discovery thrives because it’s not afraid to evolve. It respects canon while daring to reimagine the future, pushing the boundaries of what Star Trek can be. By jumping centuries ahead into the 32nd century, it opened up endless new storytelling possibilities while keeping the spirit of exploration and hope alive.

5) Enterprise

while Star Trek: Enterprise is often blamed for putting the franchise into hibernation for nearly a decade, it also has a loyal fanbase and brought some truly compelling elements to the Star Trek universe. Here’s a balanced 500-word article on what fans liked about Enterprise, despite its rocky legacy:

What Fans Loved About Star Trek: Enterprise – Even If It Almost Killed the Franchise

When Star Trek: Enterprise premiered in 2001, it was meant to revitalize the franchise by exploring the earliest days of Starfleet, long before Captain Kirk or the formation of the United Federation of Planets. Instead, it became the show many blamed for ending Star Trek’s 18-year run on television. Despite this stigma, Enterprise has earned a devoted following—and many fans believe it was misunderstood in its time.

So what did fans actually love about Star Trek: Enterprise? Quite a bit, as it turns out.

A Gritty, Grounded Look at Starfleet’s Origins

Unlike the polished utopia of The Next Generation, Enterprise presented a rougher, less idealistic Starfleet. Set in the 22nd century, just 100 years after Zefram Cochrane’s warp flight, humanity was still finding its way in deep space. Fans appreciated seeing the growing pains—diplomatic stumbles, cultural misunderstandings, and tech limitations—that gave Starfleet its moral foundation. The series tackled the how of Star Trek’s hopeful future, not just the what, giving fans a refreshing new perspective.

Captain Archer’s Imperfect Humanity

Captain Jonathan Archer (played by Scott Bakula) was a divisive figure, but many fans came to appreciate his deeply human leadership. He wasn’t a flawless moral beacon like Picard, or a battle-hardened commander like Sisko. Archer struggled—he made mistakes, questioned his ethics, and wrestled with the burdens of command. That vulnerability resonated with fans who valued a captain with room to grow, one who mirrored humanity’s evolution toward the ideals of the Federation.

The Xindi Arc and Serialized Storytelling

Though the first two seasons received mixed reviews, Season 3 shook things up with a bold, season-long arc involving the mysterious Xindi and a weapon aimed at Earth. This tight, serialized format brought urgency, tension, and character development that many fans felt revitalized the show. It was darker and more action-driven, but still had strong Trek themes of understanding and cooperation beneath the surface.

Exploration of Vulcans, Andorians, and Klingons

Enterprise gave fans a deeper look into familiar alien races. The portrayal of Vulcans as more politically complex—and occasionally arrogant—sparked debate, but ultimately enriched the lore. The inclusion of Shran, a passionate Andorian commander played by Jeffrey Combs, became a fan favorite. Klingons, too, got more backstory, including hints at the mysterious forehead-ridge continuity that Enterprise tried to explain.

A Deep Love for Star Trek Canon

Despite being a prequel, Enterprise was filled with nods to Star Trek history—sometimes subtle, sometimes overt. Episodes like “In a Mirror, Darkly,” which revisited the Mirror Universe and showed the original Constitution-class ship, became instant classics. The fourth season leaned hard into fan service, with arcs explaining how the Federation formed and revisiting important historical threads. For longtime fans, it was a treasure trove of lore.


Though Enterprise was criticized for its uneven tone and struggled in the ratings, it laid the groundwork for the rich, complicated future fans loved in later Trek shows. In hindsight, many now see it not as the show that killed Star Trek, but the one that kept its flame burning—just long enough to be reignited.

6) Picard

Star Trek: Picard – A Thoughtful Return to a Beloved Legacy

When Star Trek: Picard premiered in 2020, it wasn’t just the return of one of the franchise’s most iconic characters—it was a deep, emotional exploration of legacy, grief, and hope in the twilight years of a legendary Starfleet captain. Set decades after The Next Generation, the series reintroduced Jean-Luc Picard, not as the commanding presence on the bridge of the Enterprise, but as a retired man haunted by failure, loss, and the changing values of the Federation he once served.

This deeply personal story resonated with longtime fans who grew up with Captain Picard as a symbol of reason, ethics, and quiet strength. Star Trek: Picard flipped the traditional formula and asked a powerful question: what happens to a hero when the mission is over, but the fight isn’t?

A Character-Driven Journey

Unlike earlier Star Trek shows centered around starships and exploration, Picard is first and foremost a character study. Sir Patrick Stewart returns with a rich, nuanced performance, portraying an aging Picard who grapples with regret, mortality, and the disillusionment of a changed galaxy. This vulnerability is what grounds the show and makes it so compelling—he’s still Jean-Luc, but time has taken its toll.

Throughout the series, Picard builds a new “crew” of misfits, rebels, and outcasts, forming a surrogate family of people who are also searching for meaning. Characters like Raffi Musiker, Cristóbal Rios, Elnor, and Seven of Nine bring grit, trauma, and authenticity to a world that feels more emotionally raw than earlier Trek entries.

Revisiting and Expanding Legacy

Picard doesn’t shy away from honoring its roots. From surprise appearances by Data, Riker, and Troi, to deep dives into Borg history and synthetic life rights, the show bridges the gap between The Next Generation, Voyager, and Deep Space Nine. In doing so, it not only satisfies nostalgia but also expands on unresolved storylines with a more mature, modern lens.

Season 1 focused on the ethics of artificial intelligence, picking up threads from “The Measure of a Man” and Nemesis. Season 2 took a more metaphysical approach, exploring time travel and Picard’s personal trauma with Q (John de Lancie) returning in a brilliant arc. Season 3 brought the show full circle by reuniting the original TNG cast in a heartfelt, galaxy-spanning adventure that served as a fitting farewell.

A Darker, More Reflective Tone

Where The Next Generation championed diplomacy and utopia, Picard reflects the cynicism of a post-9/11 world—where institutions fail, trust is broken, and heroism comes at a cost. Yet beneath its darker themes lies the same Star Trek heart: the belief that even when things fall apart, individuals can make a difference.

The show doesn’t aim to recreate TNG. Instead, it tells a quieter, more introspective story about growing old, making peace with the past, and finding hope in unexpected places.


Star Trek: Picard is not just a sequel—it’s a meditation on legacy, identity, and the enduring power of compassion. By returning to one of Star Trek’s greatest captains, it reminds us that the journey never really ends—and that even in the final chapter, there’s still time to boldly go.

7) Discovery

Why Star Trek: Discovery Disappointed So Many Fans – What Went Wrong

When Star Trek: Discovery launched in 2017, expectations were sky-high. As the first Star Trek television show in over a decade, it promised to modernize the franchise with cutting-edge visuals, serialized storytelling, and a bold new direction. But despite strong early hype, Discovery ultimately divided the fanbase—and for many, it became one of the most disappointing entries in Star Trek history.

So what went wrong with Star Trek: Discovery? While the show had plenty of ambition, several key issues caused frustration among both casual viewers and lifelong Trekkies.

A Departure from Classic Star Trek Ideals

At its core, Star Trek has always stood for optimism, exploration, diplomacy, and moral philosophy. Discovery, however, leaned heavily into war, secrecy, and political intrigue—especially in its early seasons. The Federation was portrayed as morally compromised, and Starfleet officers often acted in ways that felt more at home in a dystopian thriller than Gene Roddenberry’s utopian future.

Fans felt the tone was too dark, the messaging too cynical, and the overall vibe too far removed from the hopeful spirit that had made Star Trek unique.

Over-Reliance on Serialized Drama

While serialization can deepen character arcs, Discovery often prioritized mystery-box plots over coherent storytelling. Season-long arcs like the Klingon War, the Red Angel, and the Burn began with promise but ended with rushed or unsatisfying resolutions. Many episodes were packed with exposition, plot twists, and emotional intensity—but lacked the narrative payoff or philosophical depth Star Trek is known for.

Unlike earlier Trek shows that allowed for thought-provoking, standalone episodes, Discovery’s pacing left little room for world-building or classic sci-fi exploration.

Inconsistent Character Development

Although the show featured a diverse and talented cast, many characters were underdeveloped or given inconsistent arcs. Michael Burnham, played by Sonequa Martin-Green, was positioned as the emotional core of the show—but her central role often overshadowed the ensemble. Other bridge crew members remained largely in the background, with limited dialogue or backstory.

Fans missed the team dynamic of previous series like The Next Generation or Deep Space Nine, where each character contributed meaningfully to the larger mission.

Struggles with Canon and Continuity

Placing the first two seasons in the pre-Kirk era created major continuity issues. From advanced technology (like the spore drive) to updated Klingon designs and dramatic events never mentioned in future-set series, Discovery strained Star Trek canon in ways that felt forced. Even longtime fans found it hard to reconcile the show’s vision with the established timeline.

Eventually, the writers resolved this by jumping the crew into the 32nd century—freeing them from canon but also abandoning the show’s original premise.

Style Over Substance

There’s no denying Discovery is visually stunning. But many viewers felt the show prioritized emotional spectacle, flashy effects, and action over meaningful storytelling. The constant emotional intensity—often punctuated by slow-motion sequences, swelling music, and dramatic monologues—left little space for the thoughtful, quiet moments that defined Trek’s best episodes.


Final Thoughts: Bold, Ambitious… and Misaligned

Star Trek: Discovery aimed to reinvent the franchise for modern audiences—but in doing so, it lost sight of what made Star Trek beloved in the first place. While it brought diversity, high production value, and passionate performances, the storytelling, tone, and thematic direction left many fans disappointed.

For all its strengths, Discovery often felt like a show trying to be everything at once—sci-fi epic, emotional drama, and political thriller—without fully delivering on any of them. In the end, it serves as both a bold experiment and a cautionary tale about what happens when a franchise forgets its core identity.

8) Deep Space 9

Why Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Was a Disappointment for Many Fans — At First

When Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (DS9) premiered in 1993, it broke new ground for the Star Trek franchise. But despite its ambition and strong storytelling, many longtime fans initially considered it a disappointment. Unlike the bright optimism of The Next Generation or the spirit of exploration in The Original Series, DS9 delivered a darker, more politically charged vision of the future—something that didn’t sit well with all audiences.

So why did Deep Space Nine struggle to win over fans in its early years? And what made it so different from what Star Trek fans expected?

A Stationary Setting That Felt Limiting

Star Trek had always been about boldly going where no one had gone before. DS9, on the other hand, was set on a stationary space station near a wormhole. To some fans, this felt like a betrayal of the franchise’s core identity. Without a starship exploring new worlds week after week, the sense of adventure was, at first glance, missing.

Instead of exploring unknown planets, the crew of DS9 dealt with commerce, religion, diplomacy, and long-term conflicts. For those expecting classic space missions and first-contact scenarios, the show’s premise felt static and claustrophobic.

A Darker, More Cynical Tone

Where The Next Generation embodied the optimistic ideals of the 24th century, Deep Space Nine often questioned them. Corruption within the Federation, moral ambiguity, and wartime politics played a central role. The show tackled terrorism, occupation, religious extremism, and genocide—topics that were far more intense than anything seen in previous Star Trek shows.

For fans looking for escapism and utopian ideals, DS9’s moral complexity and gray areas felt out of place in Roddenberry’s vision. The idealistic Federation wasn’t always right, and characters didn’t always make heroic choices. That level of realism was ahead of its time—but jarring for fans back in the ’90s.

A Cast That Took Time to Grow

Compared to the …

posts

First Science Fiction Television Show

The First Science Fiction TV Show: A Glimpse into Captain Video and His Video Rangers

Captain Video and His Video Rangers

Television as we know it today, with its expansive sci-fi universes and high-budget special effects, had modest beginnings. One of the first true science fiction television shows to grace the small screen was Captain Video and His Video Rangers, which aired from June 27, 1949, to April 1, 1955. While not as well-known as later sci-fi staples like Star Trek or Doctor Who, Captain Video laid the foundation for many of the genre conventions we see today.

Captain Video and His Video Rangers was produced by the DuMont Television Network, a now-defunct but historically significant channel in the early days of television. The show was set in a futuristic world where the titular Captain Video, played by Richard Coogan (and later Al Hodge), led a group of space crime-fighting agents known as the Video Rangers. Operating from their secret mountain headquarters, they protected Earth and other planets from various evildoers, using advanced technology like video phones, ray guns, and spaceships.

What Made The Show Unique

What made the show unique at the time was its attempt to depict space travel and interplanetary exploration. The plotlines were typical of the adventure serials of the time, with straightforward morality tales where good triumphed over evil. The Captain often fought against villains like the nefarious Dr. Pauli or the evil scientist, Vultura, in episodes that mixed action with technological gadgets and futuristic ideas.

Budget Constraints and Resourcefulness

One of the most fascinating aspects of Captain Video was its low-budget production. The show aired five to six days a week, and the budget per episode was notoriously tight—so tight that the show often reused props and relied heavily on stock footage. For example, space battles frequently consisted of footage from old war films, with space helmets hastily added over the pilots’ heads.

The sets were simple, the special effects rudimentary, and the costuming often improvised, giving the show an almost theatrical feel. Yet, despite these limitations, Captain Video captured the imagination of its viewers, especially younger audiences, eager to escape into its futuristic world.

Influences

Though Captain Video may look primitive by today’s standards, its influence on the science fiction genre is undeniable. It popularized the concept of space adventures on TV and paved the way for more ambitious and technically sophisticated sci-fi series like Flash Gordon, Space Patrol, and eventually Star Trek. The show also introduced early ideas about space exploration, alien worlds, and advanced technology, laying a foundation for the genre’s growth on television.

One of the more interesting aspects of Captain Video was its occasional effort to mix educational content with adventure. Some episodes included scientific explanations about technology or space exploration, reflecting the post-World War II era’s fascination with science and technology.

Legacy

While Captain Video and His Video Rangers may not have aged well in terms of its production values, it remains an important milestone in the history of television. It proved that audiences were hungry for stories set in the future, where technology and exploration could provide endless possibilities. Its success demonstrated that science fiction had a place on television, and the show’s pioneering spirit is still felt in the genre today.

In a world where space operas like The Expanse and dystopian visions like Black Mirror are thriving, it’s worth remembering the humble beginnings of televised science fiction—when a brave captain and his rangers first rocketed across the stars to capture the imaginations of a generation.…

posts

Best Science Fiction Time Machines

DeLorean

Back to the Future: Probably the most famous time machine in film history, the DeLorean from Back to the Future is beloved for its sleek, stainless steel design, flux capacitor, and the thrilling concept of time travel at 88 mph. Its car form made time travel feel accessible and fun.

Iconic Design: The DeLorean’s sleek, futuristic look (especially with its gull-wing doors) made it instantly recognizable. The car design made time travel fun and relatable, turning an everyday vehicle into a fantastical machine.

Creative Concept: The flux capacitor, a quirky yet genius invention, is central to the car’s time travel capabilities. The idea of needing to reach 88 mph to travel through time added a thrilling action element to the time travel process.

Cultural Impact: The DeLorean is so ingrained in pop culture that it has transcended the Back to the Future films, often appearing in tributes, parodies, and other media as the quintessential time machine.

TARDIS

Doctor Who: While primarily a television series, Doctor Who has featured its time machine, the TARDIS, in multiple movies. The TARDIS is unique because it appears as a simple British police box on the outside but is infinitely large on the inside. It’s iconic for its whimsical design and deep connection to the show’s mythology.

Larger on the Inside: The TARDIS, with its iconic police box exterior and infinitely large interior, captures the idea of wonder and surprise in science fiction. Its simple outward appearance conceals a powerful, time-bending vessel inside, making it a metaphor for limitless possibilities.

Timeless Appeal: The TARDIS has been around for decades and remains relevant because of its association with the long-running Doctor Who series. The concept of traveling through both time and space makes it more versatile than most other time machines.

Personality: The TARDIS itself is portrayed almost like a character in the series, sometimes with a will of its own, choosing destinations or protecting its pilot.

Also read why you should give Doctor Who another chance.

The Time Machine

The Time Machine (1960 & 2002): Based on H.G. Wells’ novel, both versions of The Time Machine feature a classic design where a person sits in a Victorian-style chair surrounded by spinning dials and lights. The 1960 version, in particular, captured the imagination of audiences with its elegant retro-futurism.

Classic and Elegant: The Victorian aesthetic of the time machine in the 1960 version ties into H.G. Wells’ original novel, making it feel like a relic of a bygone era, which adds to its mystique. The spinning discs and mechanical design create a sense of wonder without being overly technical.

Philosophical Depth: Wells’ time machine is more than just a tool for adventure. It serves as a vehicle for exploring deeper themes like societal decay, evolution, and human progress. The design fits perfectly with these themes, reinforcing the idea that technology can uncover dark futures.

Cinematic Impact: The 1960 version set the standard for future depictions of time machines, often imitated or referenced in other films.

Time Displacement Equipment

Terminator series: The time machines in Terminator movies are more functional than visually striking. They’re responsible for sending humans and robots back in time to prevent the future war, making them essential to the apocalyptic narrative.

Gritty and Realistic: The Terminator series portrays time travel in a grim, apocalyptic context. The Time Displacement Equipment isn’t glamorous but fits perfectly within the war-torn world it represents. It’s a machine built for necessity rather than wonder, grounding the story in a tough, brutal reality.

Consequences of Time Travel: Unlike many other time machines, the use of time travel in Terminator has dire consequences, shaping the future and past in irreversible ways. It’s treated as a strategic weapon in a war, raising the stakes for the entire series.

Narrative Power: The time travel concept in Terminator is central to the conflict, as each trip through time affects the future, creating the tension that drives the story.

Chronosphere

Avengers: Endgame: In Avengers: Endgame, Tony Stark’s time travel solution, the Quantum Tunnel (with the help of Hank Pym’s Quantum Realm), is sleek and scientific. It presents a more modern, high-tech take on the concept of time machines.

High-Tech and Modern: Stark’s time travel machine in Endgame is sleek, scientific, and believable within the context of the Marvel Universe. It merges cutting-edge technology with quantum mechanics, making the concept of time travel feel like a feasible scientific breakthrough.

Collaborative Creation: This machine is the product of some of the MCU’s greatest minds, from Tony Stark to Bruce Banner and Hank Pym. It shows that time travel is something that requires an incredible level of intelligence, teamwork, and innovation, adding to its prestige.

Emotional Weight: The Chronosphere isn’t just a tool for action—it’s the key to fixing the damage caused by Thanos, giving it deep emotional stakes as the heroes use it to “right” their timeline.

Sphere

Primer: Primer offers one of the most complex and realistic portrayals of time travel. The time machine in this movie is understated and almost homemade, but it reflects the film’s intricate handling of time loops and paradoxes.

Realism and Complexity: Primer is one of the most complex time travel movies ever made, and its time machine reflects this. The Sphere in Primer isn’t flashy or grand—it’s a simple, DIY-like box. The grounded, scientific approach makes time travel feel tangible, as if it could actually happen in the real world.

Intellectual Depth: The time machine’s complexity mirrors the film’s intricate narrative. It’s more of a puzzle than a piece of futuristic technology, and using it creates multiple timelines and paradoxes that engage the audience on a cerebral level.

Unique Tone: The understated design of the time machine reflects the film’s low-budget, indie feel, yet it has become a hallmark of the film’s brilliant storytelling.…

posts

Linda Zimmermann Returns to the Land of the Dead with Zombie Apocalypse

Writer Linda Zimmermann just can’t leave the dead well enough alone. Her career has been marked by her time as ghost investigator; now her career will take a different turn with her new series of stories on her new web site HVZombie.com (Hudson Valley Zombie Apocalypse).

“When I was a little kid, I saw the original ‘Night of the Living Dead’ and it scared the crap out of me,” Zimmermann said with a laugh from her home. Since that time, the Hudson Valley writer has loved “all things zombie related” and this was her chance to tell her story.

Zimmermann, a chemist-turned-author, said her goal was to tell the story of Rebecca Truesdale, a nurse from Nyack, New York who also works with a ParGenTech. Truesdale “knows a lot about bacteria, viruses and parasites.” However something “strange starts happening in the Hudson Valley as a sickness spreads. The government is telling everyone it’s just a new strain of the flu, but ordinary people suddenly become violent killers. Becks sees firsthand what the infection can do, and knows the government is lying.”

“The whole story was set in June of 2012 and my goal is to make this as realistic as possible. I want to take the ordinary but push the envelope. However, any politicians who will be in office will be the elected leaders here. It just gives a more real world feel,” said Zimmermann.

First, Zimmermann said she is working on her project on several different levels. First, she is releasing a digital book in several “segments” as opposed to chapters. She just recently released “Phase 5, 6, 7” which is available on Amazon.

Second, the website will feature video blogs and television news reports produced by Big Guy Media.  She said that she met the people at Big Guy Media while filming a paranormal show in Hudson Valley.  “I have enjoyed working with Big Guy Media,” said Zimmermann.

Each of the stories will feature an actress as “Becks” communicating with the audience. “As I write the script, I outline the important parts of the story and it allows the actors to improvise,” said Zimmermann.

Third, Zimmermann said her zombie site will be open to fans submitting their own videos that could coincide with the stories and the newscast on line. “Our goal is to make this as interactive on many levels,” she said.

Fourth, Zimmermann that another addition to the HVZombie site will be augmented reality that can be used with iPhones and smart phones. “We are working to get what is called the ‘augmented reality’ up and out,” said Zimmermann.

She said that real places mentioned in the book could be a part of the story. She explained that the owner of Joe’s Diner could be in the story. Should a fan of the HVZA show up and see the HVZA logo, the fans could point their iPhones and smart phones at the place and see a video clip that was filmed there or read the section of the story published there.

“This is really unique and not many people are doing that,” she said. “So we are pleased to do it.”

Fans can jump on board at anytime by simply visiting HVZombie.com. “Fans of the zombie genre will have a blast,” said Zimmermann. “This is a lot of fun for me and I believe readers and viewers will have as much fun as I had creating it.”

She said as long as she has to work with the dead, she might as well enjoy it. “And I have,” she said.…

posts

Why You Should Give Doctor Who A Chance

For over six decades, Doctor Who has been a beloved cornerstone of science fiction television. If you’ve never watched the show, you might wonder what all the fuss is about. With its quirky premise, a time-traveling alien who regenerates into new forms, and a rotating cast of companions, Doctor Who offers something for everyone—from thrilling adventures to deep emotional moments. Here’s why you should give Doctor Who a chance and join the legion of fans who have been captivated by this iconic show.

Why It’s So Popular

At the heart of Doctor Who‘s popularity is its endless capacity for reinvention. The Doctor, a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey, can regenerate into a new body when near death. This clever narrative device means that the show has continuously evolved over time, allowing different actors to play the Doctor, each bringing their own unique style and energy. This has kept the show fresh and relevant for generations of viewers. Moreover, Doctor Who balances imaginative sci-fi concepts with relatable human emotions. Episodes often explore themes of love, loss, and courage, wrapped in thrilling time-travel escapades. Fans also love the show’s optimism—its belief that intelligence and compassion can save the day resonates in a world that often feels cynical.

A Brief History of the Show

Doctor Who first aired in 1963 on the BBC, and it quickly became a cultural phenomenon in the UK. Originally designed as an educational show for children, mixing historical settings with futuristic science fiction, it soon expanded into something much larger. The early years of Doctor Who introduced the Daleks, one of the most iconic and feared villains in sci-fi history, cementing the show’s place in pop culture. After running continuously for 26 years, the show was put on hiatus in 1989, but its influence never waned. In 2005, Doctor Who was successfully revived by writer-producer Russell T Davies, who modernized the series for a new generation. Since then, the show has grown into a global hit, attracting fans from all over the world.

The Excitement of Doctor Who Conventions

Another testament to Doctor Who’s enduring popularity is the vibrant fan community, which comes together at Doctor Who conventions across the globe. These conventions are a place where fans can meet their favorite actors, attend panels with writers and creators, and share their love of the show with like-minded people. Attending a Doctor Who convention is a bit like stepping into the world of the show itself—cosplayers dress as different versions of the Doctor or villains like the Cybermen, while merchandise booths offer everything from sonic screwdrivers to TARDIS-themed apparel. Conventions like Gallifrey One in Los Angeles and the Doctor Who Experience in Cardiff, UK, provide immersive fan experiences that are not to be missed.

The Global Impact of Doctor Who

One of the most remarkable things about Doctor Who is its influence on popular culture. The show has inspired numerous spin-offs, audio dramas, books, and even academic discussions. It also helped launch the careers of several actors, including David Tennant, Matt Smith, and Jodie Whittaker. Beyond entertainment, Doctor Who has touched the lives of many by promoting curiosity, compassion, and a sense of adventure. Its message—that anyone can be a hero, regardless of background or identity—resonates with people of all ages.

So, if you’ve been hesitant to start watching Doctor Who, now is the perfect time to dive into this timey-wimey adventure. With its rich history, complex characters, and imaginative storytelling, you’ll find yourself captivated before you know it.…

posts

Exclusive Interview With Actor Jim Beaver

Calling all ‘Supernatural’ fans – I know you haven’t forgotten that the new season premieres this Friday (the 23rd), right?  To kick off the event, I have something very special to share with you today.

It’s not often I get the opportunity to interview someone who not only has had such a rich career in Hollywood, but who’s also a very deep, genuine man who gives much thought to the state of the world these days.  I’m very honored to be able to bring this to you.

Recently actor Jim Beaver took some time out of his very hectic schedule to answer some questions for me.  Mr. Beaver is currently co-starring in ‘Supernatural’ as Bobby, a second father to both Dean and Sam Winchester.   You can also see his past work in ‘Deadwood,’ ‘Big Love,’ ‘Reasonable Doubts,’ ‘3rd Rock from the Sun’ and was in such movies as ‘Sliver,’ ‘Magnolia,’ ‘The Life of David Gale,’ and more.

He also published a memoir entitled, “Life’s That Way” in 2009.  In it he shares personal email updates he sent to family and friends regarding his wife’s health and how they were both coping as they battled her cancer together. 

You’ll see that in question six I reference past conversations with Mr. Beaver – he and I have found ourselves in disagreement before on certain specific political issues via Facebook and Twitter.  I want to say though that they were unlike any other political debate I’ve ever gotten into before.  Mr. Beaver was extremely gracious, respectful and listened to my perspective, and his demeanor left a lasting impression on me.  In fact, afterward I realized something – THIS is how debate should be; that we (as Americans) have been doing it wrong all this time.  I walked away feeling as though I gained a greater understanding of the issues at hand, and I was so happy and relieved to know that he believes (as I do) that differing opinions doesn’t automatically make someone an adversary.  He’s a man of very strong character, and it’s so refreshing to see these characteristics portrayed in this day and age.

Much gratitude to Mr. Beaver making this interview possible – for taking the time to share some insight into what life’s like for him these days, his connection to his character, Bobby, and more!

1.    You’ve had quite a rich history in the entertainment industry (‘Deadwood,’ ‘Supernatural,’ ‘John From Cincinnati,’ ‘Day Break,’ to name just a few)…did you always want to be an actor, or did you originally have other aspirations in mind?

Although I’d acted a couple of times in elementary school plays and auditioned for a couple of high school plays, I’d never had any particular inclination to be an actor.  I wanted to be a stuntman during my high school days.  A school friend used to rag on me that I’d never be a stuntman in a million years, so I looked him up a few months ago to tell him I’d gotten my first stunt check on ‘Supernatural’ recently!  It wasn’t until I got back from Vietnam that I seriously considered acting.  At the time, what I really wanted was to be a film historian.  There were no film courses at my college, so I took theatre instead, figuring it was sort of related.  The first time I auditioned for something, I was pretty much hooked on acting.  I haven’t really ever looked back–though I ended up still doing a lot of film history work.  Just not for a living!

 
2.    I’ve read that you joined the Marine Corp after high school and spent some time in Vietnam.  What was life like for you during that time?  How have your experiences over there shape you into who you are today?

It’s a bit of a cliche, but I went into the Marines a boy and came out a man.  It matured me in a lot of ways, primarily in terms of confidence in myself.  It didn’t eradicate my natural shyness, but it certainly reduced it.  And it made me realize what I was capable of, that if I’d survived that experience, there were few things I would face that I couldn’t get through much more easily.  It expanded my world view significantly and made me a much more political person.  It gave me stories to write and experiences to draw on that ended up benefiting my career substantially, both as a television writer and as an actor.  For a time, I was one of a handful of Vietnam veteran writers in Hollywood who were frequently called on whenever a project about the war was being considered, and my first big break as an actor was directly related to my being a Vietnam veteran.  It was also in Vietnam that I happened to encounter my first significant exposure to Shakespeare, which had a profound effect on me.  I wouldn’t want to do it again, but I’m grateful for those experiences.
 

3.    In your role as Bobby in ‘Supernatural,’ how much of your personality comes through in your portrayal of him?  What similarities or differences are there between the two of you?

Bobby is in some ways the unsmoothed-over version of me.  His tenderness, his good-hearted nature, his irony and sarcasm, are, I like to think, all very much the same as mine.  His gruffness, his hardness are also part of who I am, but they’re parts I generally sublimate to the best of my ability.  I have a fearsome temper, but it doesn’t get provoked very much.  The big difference between me and Bobby is that he’s an incredibly brave man and I’m a chicken.

4.    It’s no secret that a career in acting can be, well…invasive at times.  How has adjusting to a life in the public eye affected you?

Unlike some people who find themselves in the public eye (a much better phrase than “celebrity,” which seems so unlike my experience of what’s happened), I have deliberately and with some real consideration decided to be very accessible.  I find life more interesting the more doors I keep open, so I’m all over the place with social networking and public events, much more than some actors would be comfortable being.  It has, overall, been incredibly enriching.  There are always going to be people who take it too far, who want to involve you in their lives in inappropriate ways, who want to believe that because they know your character on a show that they then know *you*.  And there are always people who want to use you to advance their own hopes and dreams.  I find most of this tolerable and quite counter-balanced by the benefit I get from being in real connection with people I wouldn’t otherwise know.  Sometimes it can be painful — telling people “no” is very difficult for me, but increasingly necessary.  For the most part, though, it has been wildly rewarding.  Having people tell you they like your work, or that you’ve touched their hearts in some way, is a magnificent gift.  I treasure my privacy, but I like to keep myself open to as much life as I can.

 
5.    Since his debut in “Devil’s Trap,” Bobby has seen and endured much (possession, paralysis, the theft of his soul to name a few).  How has his past experiences changed him from who he was in the beginning to who he is currently?

It’s hard for me to say how Bobby’s experiences have changed him.  It’s like asking how heating up the water has affected the faucet.  I’m just the guy Bobby comes through.  In all probability, the writers give much more thought to Bobby’s inner feelings than I do.  That’s not to say I don’t consider them, but I consider how to interpret them, not what they are or how they change.  That’s the writers’ job.  The soul of Bobby Singer is really found inside Eric Kripke and Sera Gamble and Ben Edlund and their cohorts.  They jointly and singly decide how these changes affect him.  I just read what they wrote and try to make it clear in performance.  If I had to commit to an opinion on this, I’d simply quote “That which does not kill me makes me stronger.”  I’d say Bobby has grown stronger through adversity and has prevailed.  So far!

 
6.    Based on our past conversations I can tell you are a man of strong convictions, and it is a very admirable quality.  What do you think is the strongest issue facing us as a global community today, and what are your suggestions for remedying it?

In the myriad of issues facing the world, I can think of none more troubling than the increasing shift toward coarseness, discourtesy, division, and inhumanity (in increasing order of distressfulness) in our public and private discourse, and our decreasing respect for education, wisdom, knowledge, scientific and intellectual awareness in favor of emotional responses to the problems of the day.  When people deal with problems and disagreements by angry and recriminatory means rather than thoughtful ones, when any disagreement is the sign of an “enemy,” when people believe that how “good” a leader makes them feel is more important than what he knows and can articulate, when the importance of education is diminished in comparison with that of personal gain, then I think the world is in grave danger, and all the other issues can be seen as merely outcroppings of those basic ones.  I live by two rules:  Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and gain all the knowledge you can.  It seems to me that being true to those two guidelines, on both a personal and a community level, would resolve pretty much everything threatening the peace of the world.

7.    I’ve recently read your book entitled “Life’s That Way.”  It is such a touching memoir..words cannot adequately convey how moved I was by it.  In a time of such intense pain, you showed great bravery and found the necessary strength that helped you to put your emotions into words, thus allowing you to share your experience with others.  If you don’t mind sharing, what made you decide to go forward with the publishing of your emails?   What advice do you have for those who are grieving the loss of a loved one?
 
I was at first somewhat reluctant to publish the emails that make up “Life’s That Way.”  Though an audience of thousands had read the original emails as I sent them out night after night, they were in a way too private still to consider making them available to the public at large, and to do all the selling and promoting necessary to market such a book seemed undignified and diminishing.  But one person in particular changed my mind.  A woman I’d known as a casual friend for many years (though I’d clearly not known her as well as I thought) talked to me about the emails once.  She told me that 25 years previously (before I’d known her), she had lost her husband and her son within 6 weeks, and she’d never talked about it to anyone.  After reading my emails about my own experience with fear and loss, she had begun talking to people about hers, and that doing so had, in her words, “changed my life.”  She had found what I had found, the richness that comes of sharing pain and sorrow with souls who care.  I instantly knew that if my emails could have that effect, then there were many others who might benefit as well.  I’ve found it to be true.  I get thousands of letters and emails from people who had just that response in their own lives.  It is unbelievably moving to me.  The book has a lot of what I would advise people who are grieving and those who care about them, too much to recount here.  I believe it is effective, because people tell me it is.  If there’s a core piece of advice, it’s to open oneself to the experience, talk about it, share it, express it, and welcome the wise (and even the unwise) attempts of others to participate in it with you.

8.  Are there any charities you give to that are near and dear to your heart?

The charity that I am most deeply involved with, the one I direct my friends to participate in to the extent of their ability, is the John Wayne Cancer Foundation (http://www.jwcf.org/).  I’ve been involved with others (Autism Speaks, The Actors Fund, etc.), but the John Wayne Cancer Foundation is the closest to my heart.

 
9.  You (and Misha) seem to enjoy being in touch with your fans via Twitter and Facebook.  What personally made you decide to join?

I think my reasons for getting involved in Facebook and Twitter are pretty well explained in my earlier comments about choosing to be less hidden away, less secretive, less cloistered than some people who achieve a certain public notice.  A lot of that feeling comes from my experiences that led to my book, when I learned the power of being open and available and more revelatory than I was used to being.  I’ve found that nothing makes me feel safer than allowing myself to be vulnerable.  Twitter and Facebook are a way for me to do that, without having a hundred thousand people show up at my house!
 

10.  After all he’s been through, what do you think is in store for Bobby in the future?  Does he stands a chance of growing old and enjoying a peaceful, normal life?

If Bobby didn’t think he had a chance to grow old in a peaceful world, I don’t think he’d bother with being a grumpy knight errant.  Hope springs eternal!

11.  What are some things you enjoy doing that help you wind down after a stressful day?

I’m an internet junkie in the worst way–have a very hard time staying away from it, despite the fact that it has seriously clobbered my artistic productivity as a writer.  Aside from that, reading and movies are my two great loves.  I try to read at least a little every day, and I’m pretty successful at that.  And as Facebook friends know, I’m a voracious movie watcher.  I love to watch them and then to write my impressions.  These are my every-single-day relaxations and enjoyments.  I deeply love a wide variety of music, and I like baseball, but I don’t devote nearly as much time to those.

12.  Working in Vancouver while having a life in the States must be tricky.  How do you manage to keep things running smoothly at home while you’re away on set? 

The biggest drawback to working in Vancouver is that I have a young daughter and a home in Los Angeles.  Were it not for my daughter, I would be wonderfully satisfied living long stretches in a hotel in Vancouver.  I’m a bit of a loner, and have a great time being by myself, so being on my own away from home is no problem usually.  But I have to be away from my daughter far too much.  Fortunately, she has a nanny who is really the only mother she remembers, a wonderful woman named Maribel who has been with her since she was 6 months old, and she cares for Maddie as though she were her own.  So I can always leave, even at a moment’s notice, knowing my daughter is in excellent, patient, loving hands.  And I have a dear friend, actress and producer Paula Rhodes, who drops by my house every few days to make sure the mail is in order and that I know about any bills that need tending.  It’s a great situation in most ways.  Fortunately for me, I love being home and I love being away, just as I love working and I love having days off.  I’m very happy and grateful for my situation these days.
 

13.  Are you living your dream right now?

You bet your ass I’m living my dream!

posts

Exclusive Interview: Noel Clarke

Author: Don E. Smith Jr

Much More Than A Tin Dog

EDITORIAL NOTE: ScienceFictionZone is indebted to Paul Salamoff and Roslyn Hill of Unstoppable Entertainment for helping arrange this interview.

–    ScienceFictionZone Staff

When “Doctor Who” returned to the airwaves in 2005 after a near-two decade absence, fans were treated to a new TARDIS, new Doctor, new companion and new supporting characters.

Enter Noel Clarke.

Clarke played the role of Mickey Smith, the boyfriend of Rose (aka Billie Piper), and he watched as a tall mysterious stranger (who looked an awful like Destro from “G.I. Joe”) stepped in and whisked her away.

Was Mickey destined for third-wheel status forever? In one episode of the second season, poor Mickey compared himself to K-9 the robot dog. “I’m the tin dog!” he shouted with despair, but speaking with Clarke, one finds he is so much more than that.  By the end of David Tennant’s role, Mickey was an action hero married to the beautiful Martha Jones (aka Freema Agyeman).

Clarke has proven more than just the usual “Doctor Who” companion, but an accomplished writer and director. Sure in 2003 he won the Laurence Olivier Award for “Most Promising New Actor” but his movies “KiDULTHOOD,” “ADULTHOOD” and “4.3.2.1” have won acclaim as well.

Thanks to assistance of writer Paul Salamoff, we were able to talk with Clarke about his time on “Doctor Who”, working with Elizabeth Sladen, and he talked with us about Doctors Nine through Eleven and he talked about the 50th anniversary of “Doctor Who.”

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: First, I want to thank you for being interviewed by us at Science Fiction Zone! Also, we owe a great deal of thanks to writer and producer Paul Salamoff, who we interviewed previously. How long have you known him?

NOEL:  I met Paul Salamoff at the Los Angeles Gallifrey One Convention in 2006. At the time I thought he was just a fan.  We spoke for a couple of hours and I found out afterwards he was a writer/producer. Not too long after that we became good friends.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Did you see his TARDIS console from the 1996 movie?

NOEL: [LAUGHS] Oh yeah! I saw it. I’ve been in his garage and it was really neat.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Since Paul lives in California, do you come to the United States much?

NOEL: I try to make it to the States twice a year. I have written several scripts and directed two feature movies, and right now my goal is to continue pressing forward with that. I am slowly clawing my way over.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Does this mean you will be coming over to the United States? Anything you can talk about?

NOEL: Ehh…I have a few plates spinning in the air at the moment that I think you will be hearing about in the near future.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Well, let me ask regarding the amount of British actors that are currently starring in American television series. Specifically, I am thinking of Andrew Lincoln from the “Walking Dead.” You can add Hugh Laurie of “House” and Kevin McKidd of “Grey’s Anatomy.”

Why is it easier for British actors to perform American accents whereas you almost want to cringe at Americans doing British accents?

NOEL: I think it is because we have had some iconography almost shoved down our throats. I mean we grew up with television shows like “Knight Rider” and “The A-Team” so we grew up with the accent, whereas Americans did not grow up with the British shows the way we were. Because of that, British actors are able to pick up the American accent easier. I mean ask an American kid if he can name an American burger joint and he can’t, but a British kid can name McDonalds.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Now you talk about filmmaking; you have written several scripts and you are a director. Do you prefer being behind the camera?

NOEL: I have to say my first love is being in front of the camera, but I like being behind the camera as well. As you said, I like to be in front of the camera and I definitely like being behind the camera, after all I directed two feature films. I want to learn as much as what I can behind and increase my longevity in the industry.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: When you were doing “Doctor Who” did you ever get a chance to come in on days you weren’t filming and just sit behind the cameras and learn the industry?

NOEL: Actually, I didn’t need to. I was filming so much I was able to pick it up as I went along. Though, [Executive Producer Russell T. Davies] gave me the opportunity to write an episode of “Torchwood.”

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: I saw on IMDB.com you were able to do that. Did John Barrowman ask you for the opportunity to write a song and dance number for Captain Jack into that episode?

NOEL: [LAUGHS] No, the actors were separate from the writers. I appreciated the chance to being part of a team of writers. After I wrote the script, Russell tweaked it a little and it was amazing.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Now if we can get into “Doctor Who” for the moment, you have said you were a fan of the original series. Was it nerve wracking knowing that you would be the number three person “Doctor Who” fans would see?

NOEL: Let me say that when the show was revitalized, there were a lot of skeptics who did not believe the show would last, but I knew when I auditioned for it that this was a quality show.

Further proof of that is, look at the way Mickey evolved as a person. When he first appeared, he was Rose’s foil and he was irked at this man who was cooler than he was. But by the end of it, he was this bearded hero, freedom fighter who was married to Martha. It was really part of the writers’ grand plan.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Focusing in on that, you played Mickey, the goofy guy who “wasn’t the tin dog” as was mentioned in the episode “School Reunion,” but in the episodes “Age of Steel” and “Army of Ghosts,” you played Ricky, a gay version of Mickey. Yet, Ricky was a man hardened by a brutal war with the Cyber Men. How was it playing such a different character?

NOEL: Actually, it is more difficult to play Mickey because he is goofy and bumbling, whereas Ricky (and the later Mickey) are closer to my personality. I relate more to the action hero/take-no-prisoners type of guy.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: So you played Mickey Smith and Ricky Smith, the Doctor goes by John Smith, Elisabeth Sladen played Sarah Jane Smith, the Doctor is currently played by Matt Smith, my name is Don Smith and I have a Doctor Who buddy named Pam Smith!

Tell me what is it about “Smiths” and “Doctor Who” that is just so awesome? [LAUGHS].

NOEL: I have no idea. [LAUGHS] I really don’t. They named Mickey Smith as a tribute to Sarah Jane Smith unsure if they would ever be able to get her, but she returned [in the previously mentioned episode “School Reunion”] and had her own series for a while.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Most “Doctor Who” fans knew she passed away from cancer back in April of this year. What was it like working with Elisabeth Sladen in “School Reunion”?

NOEL: Lis Sladen was lovely to work with. In fact, when she came to work, she was a little nervous, but she got on quite well. I was glad to see her return because she was such an important part of the history of the show.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: There is a pivotal scene where Sarah Jane Smith is coming to terms with being left behind by the Doctor. She even talks about it with Rose at one point. In the world of “Doctor Who”, it seems many of the actors, both companions and Doctors, are also left behind by the show.

Did Lis Sladen have any advice or even talk about that?

NOEL: No, she didn’t, the conversation never came up. But as actors, we are well aware of how big the show is and how important it is to have something to fall back on and understand what it means to reinvent themselves. I have been lucky; I have had my writing and my directing to fall back on.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Besides working with Lis Sladen, you worked with two different Doctors, Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant. What did each bring to the Doctor?

NOEL: I loved working with both men equally. Chris was lovely to work with, but he was able to bring a modern and hip interpretation to the character that was very intense with the leather coat. Chris was able to reestablish the show and get it moving, which allowed David to come in play the character in a lighter tone.  David played him more emotional and more likable which kept the series going.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Have you seen Matt Smith’s run as the Doctor? What do you think he brings?

NOEL: I haven’t met the guy, but he brings an air of unpredictability to the Doctor. And that’s great. I know it’s a scripted show, but I never know what Matt is going to do next. He has done a fantastic job.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Have you heard anything about the fiftieth anniversary?

NOEL: No I haven’t, and if I did, I wouldn’t be allowed to talk about it.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: That’s okay, we understand.

Thank you so much for your time! What do you have upcoming fans can look out for?

NOEL: Yeah, I have a sci-fi movie that will be out in 2011 called “Storage 24” that I did with Colin O’Donoghue and another movie called “Fast Girls” just in time for the 2012 Olympics.

SCIENCEFICTIONZONE: Well, whatever else you have coming up, stop by ScienceFictionZone.com and share it with us.

NOEL: Will do! This has been fun.

Want to find out what Noel Clarke is up to next? Visit him here and at Unstoppable Entertainment.

Images courtesy of Noel Clarke and BBC.

Also read why you should give Doctor Who another chance.…

posts

Most Watch Science Fiction TV Shows

Science fiction has long been one of the most beloved genres in television history. From its early days with pulpy, campy shows about space exploration to today’s slick, high-budget productions, sci-fi TV has continually captured the imagination of millions. Whether exploring distant galaxies, unraveling complex philosophical dilemmas, or questioning the boundaries of human existence, the best sci-fi TV shows combine compelling narratives with futuristic technology and mind-bending concepts.

Here’s a look at the most-watched and beloved science fiction TV shows of all time.

Star Trek: The Original Series (1966-1969)

Viewership Impact: While it wasn’t a huge hit during its original run, “Star Trek: The Original Series” (TOS) became a cultural juggernaut after its syndication in the 1970s. The influence of Captain James T. Kirk, Mr. Spock, and their crew aboard the USS Enterprise cannot be overstated.

Legacy: The series set the standard for episodic science fiction, with its utopian vision of the future, progressive social themes, and exploration of complex moral and ethical questions. Although its ratings were modest during the initial run, it has since become one of the most influential and beloved franchises in TV history. The show’s message of diversity and unity resonates strongly to this day.

Doctor Who (1963-Present)

Viewership Impact: As one of the longest-running science fiction series ever, “Doctor Who” has spanned multiple generations of fans since its debut in 1963. With a time-traveling alien known as “The Doctor” at its core, this British series has captivated global audiences for decades.

Legacy: “Doctor Who” is known for its ability to reinvent itself, with new actors taking on the titular role every few seasons through the concept of regeneration. The show has become a cultural institution in the UK and enjoys a massive global following. Episodes such as “Blink” and “The Day of the Doctor” have been watched by millions and are regarded as some of the best in television history. “Doctor Who” is renowned for blending camp, intellectual depth, and thrilling sci-fi adventures.

The X-Files (1993-2018)

Viewership Impact: During the 1990s, “The X-Files” dominated television with its blend of paranormal investigations and government conspiracies. Starring David Duchovny as Fox Mulder and Gillian Anderson as Dana Scully, it became a cultural phenomenon that inspired a generation of sci-fi enthusiasts.

Legacy: “The X-Files” is one of the most significant TV series of all time, reaching a peak viewership of nearly 20 million per episode in its heyday. It was instrumental in ushering in a golden age of serialized science fiction TV, with its “monster-of-the-week” format mixed with overarching mythologies about aliens, shadowy government conspiracies, and supernatural occurrences. Its eerie theme song remains instantly recognizable to this day, and its influence can be seen in many of today’s shows about conspiracies and the paranormal.

Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994)

Viewership Impact: “Star Trek: The Next Generation” (TNG) proved that the “Star Trek” franchise could be successfully revived for a new generation. The show’s mix of sophisticated storytelling, impressive special effects, and nuanced characters made it a hit among both critics and audiences.

Legacy: With Captain Jean-Luc Picard (played by Patrick Stewart) at the helm, TNG brought a cerebral and moral complexity to science fiction TV, often grappling with ethical dilemmas and philosophical questions about the future of humanity. Episodes like “The Best of Both Worlds” and “The Inner Light” remain iconic to fans. TNG was a ratings hit, especially in its later seasons, regularly pulling in millions of viewers and reinvigorating the “Star Trek” brand. Its success paved the way for a new generation of sci-fi television, including spin-offs like “Deep Space Nine” and “Voyager.”

Battlestar Galactica (2004-2009)

Viewership Impact: The reimagined “Battlestar Galactica” garnered a devoted fanbase and critical acclaim, with its gripping narrative about humanity’s survival after an apocalyptic event. Set in a distant part of the galaxy, the show follows the last remnants of the human race as they search for Earth while fleeing a relentless race of robots, the Cylons.

Legacy: The series was praised for its dark, mature themes and complex characters, tackling issues like war, religion, and human identity. “Battlestar Galactica” received numerous awards and was frequently cited for its sophisticated approach to storytelling, with notable episodes like “33” and “Downloaded.” Its influence on modern science fiction shows, especially in its treatment of political and social themes, is profound. Viewership steadily grew over the seasons, and the show ended with a massive, deeply debated finale that is still discussed among fans today.

Stranger Things (2016-Present)

Viewership Impact: One of Netflix’s biggest original hits, “Stranger Things,” took the world by storm with its nostalgic blend of 1980s pop culture, sci-fi, and supernatural horror. The show has drawn in millions of viewers and is frequently listed as one of Netflix’s most-watched series.

Legacy: “Stranger Things” tapped into a rich vein of nostalgia, appealing to fans of 1980s films like “The Goonies,” “E.T.,” and “Stand by Me.” Its combination of a compelling cast of young actors, well-written characters, and an overarching mystery involving parallel dimensions and government experiments has kept audiences hooked for multiple seasons. The show continues to be a pop-culture phenomenon, spawning countless memes, merchandise, and even themed attractions.

Lost (2004-2010)

Viewership Impact: “Lost” was a cultural sensation when it premiered, blending science fiction with drama, mystery, and supernatural elements. The show attracted a huge following, with its intricate, character-driven plot and a central mystery that kept millions of viewers guessing until its controversial finale.

Legacy: Although “Lost” wasn’t purely sci-fi in its first few seasons, it increasingly incorporated time travel, parallel universes, and futuristic technology. The show had a huge cultural impact, influencing many subsequent sci-fi and mystery series. At its peak, it drew in over 16 million viewers per episode and became a global talking point, especially as fan theories proliferated across the internet. “Lost” remains one of the most discussed TV shows of all time, and its complex narrative structure changed how serialized TV was produced.

The Mandalorian (2019-Present)

Viewership Impact: As one of Disney+’s flagship series, “The Mandalorian” quickly became one of the most-watched TV shows in the world. Set in the Star Wars universe, the show introduced the iconic character of Grogu (commonly known as Baby Yoda), who quickly became a pop culture sensation.

Legacy: With its high production value, “The Mandalorian” brought cinematic storytelling to the small screen, setting a new standard for streaming sci-fi content. The series has reinvigorated the Star Wars brand on television, attracting both die-hard fans and newcomers alike. Its viewership numbers are enormous, regularly ranking among the most-watched streaming shows each year. “The Mandalorian” also helped cement the idea that streaming services could produce big-budget, high-quality science fiction television on par with major film releases.

Also we recommend taking a look at Apple TV because they have a reputation of produces some great science fiction television, such as Silo.

These shows have shaped the landscape of science fiction television, offering audiences endless fascination with the unknown, pushing the boundaries of human imagination, and capturing the hearts of viewers across the globe. Whether through epic space battles, mind-bending time travel, or eerie government conspiracies, these series continue to influence the genre and attract legions of fans, cementing their place in television history.…

Scroll to Top